Last updated: May 2026 | How KairosTrue handles errors and publishes corrections
KairosTrue is committed to accuracy. When we make an error — and all serious media organisations do — we correct it promptly, transparently and completely. We do not silently edit articles. We do not hide mistakes. Corrections are an expression of editorial integrity, not a sign of weakness. This policy explains exactly how the KairosTrue corrections process works.
Our Commitment
Every article published on KairosTrue is researched, verified and edited before publication. We take accuracy seriously at every stage of production. Despite these standards, errors of fact, figures, dates, names or analysis occasionally occur. Financial data changes rapidly, sources sometimes contain errors themselves, and human oversight is never perfect.
When an error is identified — whether by a reader, a source, or by our own editorial team — we act quickly. We do not wait. We do not debate whether an error is significant enough to correct. If something is wrong, we fix it. That is the standard.
What Qualifies as a Correction
A correction is issued when a published article contains a factual inaccuracy — a claim that is verifiably false, a figure that is wrong, a name that is misspelled, a date that is incorrect, or a characterisation of data or events that is materially misleading. The following are all grounds for a formal correction:
- An incorrect economic figure, market statistic or financial data point
- A wrong date for a policy decision, earnings release or market event
- A misspelled name of a person, institution, company or policy
- An incorrect attribution — quoting someone or something with the wrong source
- A factual claim about a company, institution or individual that is demonstrably wrong
- A characterisation of data that materially misrepresents what the data shows
- Any other factual error that could mislead a reader about financial markets or economic conditions
Corrections are distinct from updates. If circumstances change after an article is published — a central bank reverses a decision, an earnings figure is restated — the article may be updated with new information rather than corrected. Updates are labelled as "Updated" with a new date. They do not indicate the original article contained an error.
How Corrections Are Published
How a Correction Notice Looks
Every corrected article carries a visible correction notice. The format is as follows:
Correction — [Date]: An earlier version of this article stated that the Federal Reserve raised interest rates by 50 basis points at its March 2024 meeting. The correct figure is 25 basis points. The article has been updated accordingly. KairosTrue regrets the error.
Correction notices are always placed at the top or bottom of the corrected article, in a clearly visible format. They are never buried in the body of the text where a reader might miss them.
Significant Corrections
Where an error is significant — an incorrect claim that materially misrepresented a company, institution, individual or market event and that may have been read widely before the error was identified — KairosTrue may issue a standalone correction notice as a separate piece of content in addition to correcting the original article. This is consistent with the standards applied by major financial media organisations.
What We Do Not Do
- We do not quietly edit articles to fix errors without a correction notice.
- We do not delete articles to avoid acknowledging errors.
- We do not ignore correction requests because the error seems minor.
- We do not delay corrections pending a commercial consideration or editorial convenience.
- We do not issue corrections under pressure for claims that have been verified as accurate.
Disagreements and Clarifications
Not every request for a correction identifies a genuine error. A reader may disagree with our analysis, our interpretation of data, or our editorial conclusions. Disagreement with analysis is not the same as a factual error. KairosTrue is not obligated to change its analytical conclusions because a reader disagrees with them.
Where a reader believes our analysis is flawed in its reasoning — rather than wrong in its facts — we welcome that challenge and will review it carefully. If we find merit in the challenge, we may publish a follow-up piece responding to it. We will not, however, alter our editorial conclusions based on pressure, complaint volume, or commercial consideration.
Submit a Correction
If you believe a KairosTrue article contains a factual error, please contact our corrections team with the article title, the specific claim you believe is inaccurate, and your source or evidence where possible.
meesamabbas970@gmail.com
All correction requests are reviewed within 24 hours. We read every submission.
No comments:
Post a Comment